Opinion
2022-00760
02-04-2022
IN THE MATTER OF BERNICE CURRY-MALCOLM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, RESPONDENT, HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, RUSH-HENRIETTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ASSOCIATION OF SUPERVISORS AND ADMINISTRATORS OF ROCHESTER, AND BROWN HUTCHINSON LLP, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
BERNICE CURRY-MALCOLM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE. LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (DUSTIN J. BROCKNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. FERRARA, FIORENZA PC, EAST SYRACUSE (MILES G. LAWLOR OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND
BERNICE CURRY-MALCOLM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (DUSTIN J. BROCKNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
FERRARA, FIORENZA PC, EAST SYRACUSE (MILES G. LAWLOR OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Gail Donofrio, J.), entered August 4, 2020 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, among other things, granted the pre-answer motions to dismiss the petition brought by respondents Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District, Rush-Henrietta Central School District, Rochester City School District, Association of Supervisors and Administrators of Rochester, and Brown Hutchinson LLP.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.