From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Currence v. U.S. Dist. Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 15, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV376 (E.D. Va. Jun. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20CV376

06-15-2020

KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, et al., Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 27, 2020, the Court received a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) filed by Kareem Jamal Currence. ("Petition for Writ of Mandamus," ECF No. 1.) In the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Currence seeks a ruling by the Court on a pending Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion in his criminal action, Criminal No. 3:05CR231. (ECF No. 1, at 1-2.) Currence's motion is clearly labeled with the header, "UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT," and Currence, therefore, should have mailed his Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the Fourth Circuit, not to this Court. Moreover, a review of the record in his criminal case reveals that Currence's action is currently pending on appeal with the Fourth Circuit. This Court cannot rule on a Rule 33 motion until the appeal has been resolved. See Fed. R. Crim P. 33(b)(1). Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 15 June 2020
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Currence v. U.S. Dist. Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 15, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV376 (E.D. Va. Jun. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Currence v. U.S. Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jun 15, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20CV376 (E.D. Va. Jun. 15, 2020)