Opinion
No. 14-7622
03-02-2015
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. E.K. CAULEY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00088) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court's orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions, and he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Currence leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Currence v. Cauley, No. 1:11-cv-00088 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2014; Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED