From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curran v. Spyder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 17, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2127 (M.D. Pa. May. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2127

05-17-2012

JOHN F. CURRAN, III Plaintiff v. CARBON SPYDER, JOHN L. MITCHELL, and RONALD WELSH Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Smyser)


ORDER

Before the court in the captioned action is an April 25, 2012 report of the magistrate judge. No timely objections have been filed.

Accordingly, this 17th day of May, 2012, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Smyser.

2) The claims in the amended complaint against Defendant Welsh are dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

3) Defendant Welsh is terminated from this action.

4) Defendant Welshs' motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 49, 51) are denied as moot.

5) The case is remanded to Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser for further proceedings.

___________

YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Curran v. Spyder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 17, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2127 (M.D. Pa. May. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Curran v. Spyder

Case Details

Full title:JOHN F. CURRAN, III Plaintiff v. CARBON SPYDER, JOHN L. MITCHELL, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 17, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2127 (M.D. Pa. May. 17, 2012)