From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curley v. Szumowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 2000

February 24, 2000

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), entered December 7, 1998, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Montfort, Healy, McGuire Salley, Garden City, N.Y. (Edward R. Rimmels and Donald Neuman of counsel), for appellants.

Michael N. David, New York, N.Y., for respondents.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs (see, Leonard v. Kinney Sys., 199 A.D.2d 470 ; Lipsius v. White, 91 A.D.2d 271, 276 ), the emergency doctrine does not entitle the defendants to summary judgment as a matter of law. The record presents issues of fact concerning the participation of the defendant Gregory Szumowski in the creation of the emergency (see,Rivera v. New York City Tr. Auth., 77 N.Y.2d 322, 327 ), and whether the conduct of that defendant, considered in light of the emergency, was reasonable (see, Ferrer v. Harris, 55 N.Y.2d 285, 293 ).


Summaries of

Curley v. Szumowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Curley v. Szumowski

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CURLEY, ETC., et al., respondents, v. BOZENA SZUMOWSKI, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 732