From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curis v. James

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 25, 2024
SC 166758 (Mich. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

SC 166758 COA 365003

09-25-2024

JASON M. CURIS and LAURYN M. CURIS, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants- Appellees, v. JOHN A. JAMES, SHARON N. JAMES, PERRY JOHNSON, PETER MANNINO, and MARIE MANNINO, Defendants-Appellees, and REGINALD KAKOS, JESSICA KAKOS, ROMAN SHLAFER, MILENA SHLAFER, RAMANI VADLAMURI, SREEKIRTHI BHAGYA VADLAMURI, JACQUES G. DARMON, MARK C. MILGROM, Trustee of MARK C. MILGROM LIVING TRUST, MOONDEEP AGGARWAL, KAMNA AGGARWAL, MAZEN SHINA, NIRAN SHINA, LINDA SOLOMON, MONA RAPPAPORT, Trustee of DANIEL J. RAPPAPORT MARITAL TRUST, MARVIN FISHMAN, HEMANT H. SHAH, NAYANA H. SHAH, KEN MORGAN, SIMEN SAVAYA, and RACHEL SAVAYA, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs- Appellants.


Oakland CC: 2021-189533-CH

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2024 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Curis v. James

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 25, 2024
SC 166758 (Mich. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Curis v. James

Case Details

Full title:JASON M. CURIS and LAURYN M. CURIS, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

SC 166758 (Mich. Sep. 25, 2024)