From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curis v. James

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 10, 2024
SC 166758 (Mich. May. 10, 2024)

Opinion

SC 166758 (32) COA 365003

05-10-2024

JASON M. CURIS and LAURYN M. CURIS, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-Appellees, v. JOHN A. JAMES, SHARON N. JAMES, PERRY JOHNSON, PETER MANNINO, and MARIE MANNINO, Defendants-Appellees, and REGINALD KAKOS, JESSICA KAKOS, ROMAN SHLAFER, MILENA SHLAFER, RAMANI VADLAMURI, SREEKIRTHI BHAGYA VADLAMURI, JACQUES G. DARMON, MARK C. MILGROM, Trustee of MARK C. MILGROM LIVING TRUST, MOONDEEP AGGARWAL, KAMNA AGGARWAL, MAZEN SHINA, NIRAN SHINA, LINDA SOLOMON, MONA RAPPAPORT, Trustee of DANIEL J. RAPPAPORT MARITAL TRUST, MARVIN FISHMAN, HEMANT H. SHAH, NAYANA H. SHAH, KEN MORGAN, SIMEN SAVAYA, and RACHEL SAVAYA, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs- Appellants.


Oakland CC: 2021-189533-CH

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice, Brian K. Zahra, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Megan K. Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch, Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs/counterdefendants-appellees to extend the time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted on May 7, 2024, is accepted as timely filed.


Summaries of

Curis v. James

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 10, 2024
SC 166758 (Mich. May. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Curis v. James

Case Details

Full title:JASON M. CURIS and LAURYN M. CURIS…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 10, 2024

Citations

SC 166758 (Mich. May. 10, 2024)