From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cureton v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Aug 23, 2016
3:15cv405-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2016)

Opinion

3:15cv405-FDW

08-23-2016

KEITH CURETON, Petitioner, v. FRANK L. PERRY, Respondent.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon initial review of Petitioner Keith Cureton's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1.)

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitioner is a prisoner of the State of North Carolina. On August, 20, 2015, Petitioner signed and placed the instant § 2254 petition in the Foothills Correctional Institution's mail system. (Pet. 15, Doc. No. 1.) It was received and docketed in this Court on September 1, 2015. On September 2, 2015, the Clerk of Court mailed Petitioner a notice of deficiency alerting him that he was required to pay a $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit of indigency. On December 29, 2015 a second notice of deficiency was sent to Petitioner at Alexander Correctional Institution, where he had been transferred. (Doc. No. 2.) Petitioner was provided twenty-one (21) days to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit of indigency. As of the filing of this Order, Petitioner has done neither.

II. DISCUSSION

Federal law requires that a petitioner seeking habeas review of his state conviction and/or sentence in federal district court pay a filing fee in the amount of $5.00 or be granted leave to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs. To establish an inability to pay, the petitioner must provide the court with an affidavit of indigency and "a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or the institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

Petitioner has had more than sufficient time to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), but has failed to do so. Therefore, the Court will dismiss the habeas petition without prejudice to Petitioner's ability to refile it, along with the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Signed: August 23, 2016

/s/_________

Frank D. Whitney

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cureton v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Aug 23, 2016
3:15cv405-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Cureton v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:KEITH CURETON, Petitioner, v. FRANK L. PERRY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 23, 2016

Citations

3:15cv405-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2016)