From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curen v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

May, 1932.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Van Kirk, P.J., and Rhodes, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the plaintiff was negligent in that there was not the required lateral light upon this truck and that it was a contributing cause of the accident.


Summaries of

Curen v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Curen v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:W. FRED VAN CUREN, Respondent, v. CHESTER A. ANDERSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)