From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curcio v. Cnty. of Grossman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 14, 2022
22 CIVIL 1648 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

22 CIVIL 1648 (VB)

03-14-2022

ROSANNA CURCIO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF PUTNAM JUDGE VICTOR GROSSMAN; DONNA E. ABRAMS; LAURA ROBERTS; COUNTY OF PUTNAM, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 14, 2022, this action is DISMISSED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is hereby entered dismissing this case.


Summaries of

Curcio v. Cnty. of Grossman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 14, 2022
22 CIVIL 1648 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Curcio v. Cnty. of Grossman

Case Details

Full title:ROSANNA CURCIO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF PUTNAM JUDGE VICTOR GROSSMAN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

22 CIVIL 1648 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2022)