From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curbelo v. Pendergraph

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 15, 2007
229 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7175.

Submitted: April 25, 2007.

Decided: June 15, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cv-00021).

Francisco Curbelo, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Douglas MacLatchie, Sean Francis Perrin, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Francisco Curbelo appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Curbelo v. Pendergraph, No. 3:04-cv-00021, 2006 WL 2240450 (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Curbelo v. Pendergraph

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 15, 2007
229 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Curbelo v. Pendergraph

Case Details

Full title:Francisco CURBELO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim PENDERGRAPH, Sheriff…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2007

Citations

229 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2007)