From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cupp v. Baron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 13, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00285-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 13, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:20-cv-00285-JAD-NJK

08-13-2020

Matthew Joseph Cupp, Plaintiff v. Richard Baron, et al., Defendant


Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Claims against Baron Brothers Partnership, L.P. [ECF No. 27]

Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe recommends that plaintiff's claims against the Baron Brothers Partnership, L.P. be dismissed because plaintiff failed to file proof that this partnership defendant has been served with process. The deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."

ECF No. 27.

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). --------

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 27] is ADOPTED in full;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the claims against Defendant Baron Brothers Partnership, L.P. are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this party from this action.

Dated: August 13, 2020

/s/_________

U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey


Summaries of

Cupp v. Baron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 13, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00285-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Cupp v. Baron

Case Details

Full title:Matthew Joseph Cupp, Plaintiff v. Richard Baron, et al., Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 13, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:20-cv-00285-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 13, 2020)