From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cupka v. Remik Holdings LLC

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Oct 14, 2021
No. 2021-73136 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2021-73136 Motion 2021-03048

10-14-2021

Dorothy Cupka, Jeffrey Smith, Flor Herrera-Picasso, Eduardo Picasso and Nilunda Rasonmath, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Remik Holdings LLC, Defendant-Respondent. Index No. 159054/18 Nos. 2021-01865


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

PRESENT: HON. SALLIE MANZANET-DANIELS, JUSTICE PRESIDING CYNTHIA S. KERN JEFFREY K. OING MARTIN SHULMAN JULIO RODRIGUEZ, III, JUSTICES.

Appeals having been taken to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about April 30, 2020 (Case No. 2021-01865), and from an order, same Court, entered on or about December 09, 2020 (Case No. 2021-01868), And plaintiffs-appellants having moved for an order permitting the aforesaid appeals to be deemed perfected and/or extending the time in which to perfect the appeals; or vacating the automatic dismissal or any other dismissal of the appeals, nunc pro tunc, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that the dismissals are vacated, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c), the appeals reinstated, and the time in which to perfect said appeals is extended to the February 2022 Term of this Court.


Summaries of

Cupka v. Remik Holdings LLC

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Oct 14, 2021
No. 2021-73136 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Cupka v. Remik Holdings LLC

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy Cupka, Jeffrey Smith, Flor Herrera-Picasso, Eduardo Picasso and…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

Date published: Oct 14, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-73136 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 14, 2021)