From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 21, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-129

2013-10-21

CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #8), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is also DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous.

________________________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 21, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Oct 21, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-129 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 21, 2013)