From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Upwell Health, LLC

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jul 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-894 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-894

07-28-2020

CRAIG CUNNINGHAM v. UPWELL HEALTH, LLC, ET AL.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 2, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #63) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Craig Cunningham's claims against Defendants Upwell Holding, Inc. and Upwell Health, LLC be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Upwell Holding, Inc. and Upwell Health, LLC are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 28th day of July, 2020.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Upwell Health, LLC

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jul 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-894 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Upwell Health, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG CUNNINGHAM v. UPWELL HEALTH, LLC, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 28, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-894 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 2020)

Citing Cases

Cont'l Indem. Co. v. Bulson Mgmt.

See, e.g., Fluor Eng'rs & Constructors, Inc. v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 753 F.2d 444, 449 n.7 (5th Cir. 1985);…