From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 3, 1996
935 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 69776

OPINION FILED: December 3, 1996

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS HON. THOMAS F. McGUIRE.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.



ORDER


Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cunningham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 3, 1996
935 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Cunningham v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR CUNNINGHAM, MOVANT-APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Dec 3, 1996

Citations

935 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)