From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Rich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 20, 2011
No. CIV S-11-3286 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-3286 CKD P

12-20-2011

WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL RICH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

In this case, none of the defendants reside in this district. The claim arose in Los Angeles County, which is in the Central District of California. Therefore, plaintiff's claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

____________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/md; cunn3286.21


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Rich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 20, 2011
No. CIV S-11-3286 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Rich

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL RICH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-3286 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Automobile Insurance v. Trimble

(3) Money in its popular sense is employed as synonymous with property; anything having a conventional use as…

Felder v. Richardson

osition of the present question need not be determined. A surrender by agreement, whether express or implied,…