From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Pierce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 4, 2013
Case No. 3:13cv00213 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13cv00213

2013-10-04

LARON N. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. B. D. PIERCE, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington


DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #8), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on September 10, 2013 (Doc. #8) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff Laron N. Cunningham's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
3. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order adopting the Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is denied; and,
4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

____________________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Pierce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 4, 2013
Case No. 3:13cv00213 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:LARON N. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. B. D. PIERCE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Oct 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13cv00213 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 4, 2013)