From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Meridian Credit Grp., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 11, 2019
Case No. EDCV 18-1889 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 18-1889 JGB (SHKx)

02-11-2019

Heidi Cunningham, Plaintiff, v. Meridian Credit Group, LLC, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the Order filed concurrent herewith, Plaintiff Heidi Cunningham Motion's for Default Judgment against Defendant Meridian Credit Group, LLC, is GRANTED IN PART. Default judgment is GRANTED as to both of Plaintiff's Causes of Action. Plaintiff's request for damages and attorneys' fees are GRANTED IN PART. The Court declares the following:

1. Plaintiff is AWARDED $2,000 in statutory damages, $8,410 in attorneys' fees, and $585 in costs.

2. Plaintiff is ORDERED to mail or personally serve a copy of this Judgment and the Order concurrently filed therewith to Defendant. Plaintiff shall file Proof of Service with the Court within ten days of the date of the Order.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Heidi Cunningham and against Meridian Credit Group, LLC. Dated: February 11, 2019

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Meridian Credit Grp., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 11, 2019
Case No. EDCV 18-1889 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Meridian Credit Grp., LLC

Case Details

Full title:Heidi Cunningham, Plaintiff, v. Meridian Credit Group, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 11, 2019

Citations

Case No. EDCV 18-1889 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2019)

Citing Cases

Warner v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.

"The Ninth Circuit has not articulated a standard for identifying ‘unfair or unconscionable’ conduct outside…

Raymo v. Definitive Consulting Servs.

The Court finds that this amount is neither too large nor unreasonable and concludes that the fourth Eitel…