From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Matrix Fin. Servs.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-896 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 1, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-896

06-01-2020

CRAIG CUNNINGHAM v. MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 12, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #60) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that (1) Defendants' Motions to Set Aside Default (Dkts. #25; #28; #31) and Motions for Leave to File an Answer (Dkts. #26; #29; #32) be granted; (2) the Clerk's Entry of Default (Dkt. #18) be set aside; and (3) Defendants' Answers (Dkts. #27; #30; #33) be deemed properly filed before the Court. In addition, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #34) should also necessarily be denied upon the setting aside of the default. On May 26, 2020, Plaintiff filed a further notice confirming withdrawal of his opposition to setting aside the default and waiver of any objections to the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #69).

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

The Parties waived the objections period. --------

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Set Aside Default (Dkts. #25; #28; #31) and Motions for Leave to File an Answer (Dkts. #26; #29; #32) are GRANTED; the Clerk's Entry of Default (Dkt. #18) is set aside; Defendants' Answers (Dkts. #27; #30; #33) are deemed properly filed before the Court; and Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #34) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 1st day of June, 2020.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Matrix Fin. Servs.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-896 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 1, 2020)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Matrix Fin. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG CUNNINGHAM v. MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 1, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-896 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 1, 2020)

Citing Cases

MJM Real Estate Invs. v. Great Lakes Ins. SE

Cunningham v. Matrix Fin. Servs., LLC, No. 4:19-CV-896-ALM-CAN, 2020 WL 2858810, at *3 (E.D. Tex. May 12,…