From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 12, 2004
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-0737-G (N.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 2004)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-0737-G.

October 12, 2004


ORDER


After reviewing the objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation ("Findings") of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings of the court, except for the following: (1) on page 3, line sixteen, the word "id." should be removed; (2) on page 4, line seven, the period after "December 15, 2003" should be removed; (3) on page 5, line seven, the word "of" should be inserted between the words "writ" and "mandamus"; (4) on page 5, line eighteen and continuing on page 6, line 1, there should be no quotation marks within the parenthetical, the word "withdraw" should be "withdrawn," and the period at the end of the sentence in the parenthetical should be removed; and (5) on page 6, line 16, a comma should be inserted after the word "Lastly."

It is therefore ORDERED that those Findings, except as modified herein, are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court.


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 12, 2004
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-0737-G (N.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 2004)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND R. CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Oct 12, 2004

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-0737-G (N.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 2004)