Opinion
03-25-2016
Dara R. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Arlyn C. CUNNINGHAM, Jr., Defendant–Respondent. In the Matter of Dara R. Cunningham, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Arlyn C. Cunningham, Jr., Respondent–Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.).
Michael Steinberg, Rochester, for Plaintiff–Appellant and Petitioner–Appellant. J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for Defendant–Respondent and Respondent–Respondent. Tiffany M. Sorgen, Attorney for The Child, Canandaigua.
Michael Steinberg, Rochester, for Plaintiff–Appellant and Petitioner–Appellant.
J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for Defendant–Respondent and Respondent–Respondent.
Tiffany M. Sorgen, Attorney for The Child, Canandaigua.
Opinion
Same memorandum as in Cunningham v. Cunningham (Appeal No. 3), –––A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2016 WL 1164962 (Mar. 25, 2016).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal insofar as it challenges the award of custody to defendant-respondent is unanimously dismissed, and the order is affirmed without costs.
SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.