From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuneo v. Settlement Capital Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1725 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1725.

August 31, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiffs' Complaint was received by the Clerk of Court and was subsequently referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (the "R R"), filed on July 27, 2007, recommended that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Objections were filed by the Plaintiff but withdrawn shortly thereafter.

After review of the pleadings in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2007:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

The Clerk shall mark this case closed.


Summaries of

Cuneo v. Settlement Capital Corporation

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1725 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2007)
Case details for

Cuneo v. Settlement Capital Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT E. CUNEO, individually and t/a A.E. CUNEO II FREELANCE APPRAISAL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 31, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1725 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

Roach v. Verterano

Issue preclusion applies to the decisions of bankruptcy courts in a subsequent district court proceeding.…

Disen v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC

; Bd. Of Trustees v. Centra, 983 F.2d 495, 505-06 (3d Cir. 1992) (preclusive effect of bankruptcy court order…