From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cumpian v. Lack

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Dec 4, 2008
No. 13-08-00210-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2008)

Opinion

No. 13-08-00210-CV

Opinion delivered and filed December 4, 2008.

On appeal from the County Court at Law of Calhoun County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and BENAVIDES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 24, 2008. On October 2, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. No response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Cumpian v. Lack

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Dec 4, 2008
No. 13-08-00210-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Cumpian v. Lack

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY WAYNE CUMPIAN, Appellant, v. JAY LACK, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Dec 4, 2008

Citations

No. 13-08-00210-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2008)