From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummins v. Lake Cty. Bd. Cty. Comm'rs

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 19, 1996
671 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-1738.

April 19, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County; Don F. Briggs, Judge.

Frederick C. Morello, of Frederick C. Morello, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

David V. Kornreich and Jeffrey E. Mandel, of Muller, Mintz, Kornreich, Caldwell, Casey, Crosland Bramnick, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.


Because we conclude that appellant's internal communications do not rise to the level necessary under Florida's Whistle Blower's Act, section 112.3187(5), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), and that the Lake County personnel to whom appellant expressed his concerns are not within the scope of persons disclosure to whom is protected by section 112.3187 (6), we affirm.

It also appears that the claim may be time barred, as urged on appeal by appellee, but this was not an issue raised on motion for summary judgment and accordingly cannot be the basis for upholding the summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cummins v. Lake Cty. Bd. Cty. Comm'rs

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 19, 1996
671 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Cummins v. Lake Cty. Bd. Cty. Comm'rs

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CUMMINS, APPELLANT, v. LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 19, 1996

Citations

671 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)