From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummins v. Bridges

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 12, 1914
140 P. 1146 (Okla. 1914)

Opinion

No. 3505

Opinion Filed May 12, 1914.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Verdict — Evidence. Where there is competent evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict of the jury, under proper instructions from the court, this court will not disturb the verdict.

(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)

Error from County Court, Jefferson County; B. T. Price, Judge.

Action by W. J. Bridges against B. V. Cummins. Judgement for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Bridges Vertrees, for plaintiff in error.

J. G. Clift, for defendant in error.


This is an action on a promissory note for $380.15, balance due on an open account for lumber. Defendant filed an answer, asking for credit of $223.39 for material returned; $7.05 for broken glass; $7 expended in obtaining glass; $50 for difference in price and grade of lumber; and $50 for damages. These questions were properly submitted to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of W. J. Bridges and against B. V. Cummins for $180.76. There being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, this court will not disturb the same.

The judgment of the lower court should therefore be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Cummins v. Bridges

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 12, 1914
140 P. 1146 (Okla. 1914)
Case details for

Cummins v. Bridges

Case Details

Full title:CUMMINS v. BRIDGES

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 12, 1914

Citations

140 P. 1146 (Okla. 1914)
140 P. 1146

Citing Cases

Muskogee Electric Trac. Co. v. Cooper

It is well settled in this jurisdiction that where the law applicable to the facts material to the issue…

Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. v. Gilmore

The only errors presented for our consideration involve the single inquiry as to whether the verdict is…