From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummins, Inc. v. SC

Supreme Court of California.
Sep 10, 2003
4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 703 (Cal. 2003)

Opinion

No. S117726.

09-10-2003

CUMMINS, INC. v. S.C. (COX).

Tami S. Smason, Leila Nourani, Foley & Lardner, Los Angeles, CA, for Cummins, Inc.Lawrence J. Hutchens, Attorney at Law, Michael Scott Humphries, Law Offices of Lawrence J. Hutchens, Bellflower, CA, for Edward D. Cox and Sandi R. Cox.Patrick James Wehage, Thomas M. Murphy, Sutton & Murphy, Mission Viego, CA, for Winnebago Industries, Inc.Martin William Anderson, Attorney at Law, Santa Ana, CA, for Anderson Law Firm.Keith A. Dawson, Dawson & Dawson, Corona Del Mar, CA, for Monaco Coach Corporation.Petition for review granted.


Tami S. Smason, Leila Nourani, Foley & Lardner, Los Angeles, CA, for Cummins, Inc.

Lawrence J. Hutchens, Attorney at Law, Michael Scott Humphries, Law Offices of Lawrence J. Hutchens, Bellflower, CA, for Edward D. Cox and Sandi R. Cox.

Patrick James Wehage, Thomas M. Murphy, Sutton & Murphy, Mission Viego, CA, for Winnebago Industries, Inc.

Martin William Anderson, Attorney at Law, Santa Ana, CA, for Anderson Law Firm.

Keith A. Dawson, Dawson & Dawson, Corona Del Mar, CA, for Monaco Coach Corporation.

Petition for review granted.

GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cummins, Inc. v. SC

Supreme Court of California.
Sep 10, 2003
4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 703 (Cal. 2003)
Case details for

Cummins, Inc. v. SC

Case Details

Full title:CUMMINS, INC. v. S.C. (COX).

Court:Supreme Court of California.

Date published: Sep 10, 2003

Citations

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 703 (Cal. 2003)
76 P.3d 364