From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummings v. Shankland

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
CV 14-7017-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

          David T Cummings, Petitioner, Pro se, Represa, CA.

          For P. Shankland, Respondent: Gary A Lieberman, LEAD ATTORNEY, CAAG - Office of Attorney General of California, Los Angeles, CA; Shawn McGahey Webb, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition as untimely be granted and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Cummings v. Shankland

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
CV 14-7017-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Cummings v. Shankland

Case Details

Full title:DAVID T. CUMMINGS, Petitioner, v. P. SHANKLAND, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

CV 14-7017-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)