From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummings v. Reposky

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 17, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-70 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-70.

December 17, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The civil rights complaint of William Brandon Cummings's ("plaintiff") was received by this court on January 20, 2009, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on November 18, 2009, recommended that the partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 26) filed by defendants G.K. Reposky, Thomas Richter, Thomas corbett, Edward G. Rendell, Jeffrey Beard, Nurse Kutcher ("defendants) be granted. Plaintiff timely filed objections on November 25, 2009 (Doc. 37), raising issues already considered and appropriately addressed in the Report and Recommendation.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2009,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the partial motion to dismiss filed by defendants (Doc. 26) is GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bissoon (Doc. 37), dated November 18, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Cummings v. Reposky

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 17, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-70 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Cummings v. Reposky

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS, Plaintiff, v. CG REPOSKY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 17, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-70 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2009)