From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummings v. Othmer

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Aug 5, 2021
No. 20-2371-DDC (D. Kan. Aug. 5, 2021)

Opinion

20-2371-DDC

08-05-2021

PAMELA LYNN CUMMINGS, Plaintiff, v. AARON OTHMER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

James P. O'Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to amend her complaint to add a party (ECF No. 32). D. Kan. Rule 15.1(a) requires parties “filing a motion to amend” to “set forth a concise statement of the amendment” and “attach the proposed pleading.” Plaintiff's motion does not indicate what claims she seeks to bring against the proposed new party or that parties' alleged involvement in the facts underlying this case. In addition, plaintiff has not attached her proposed amended complaint to her motion. Because plaintiff has not complied with Rule 15.1(a), her motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED without prejudice to refiling.

Plaintiff is hereby informed that, within 14 days after she is served with a copy of this order, she may, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 and D. Kan. Rule 72.1.4(a), file written objections to this order by filing a motion requesting that the presiding U.S. district judge review this order. A party must file any objections within the 14-day period if the party wants to have appellate review of this order.


Summaries of

Cummings v. Othmer

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Aug 5, 2021
No. 20-2371-DDC (D. Kan. Aug. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Cummings v. Othmer

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA LYNN CUMMINGS, Plaintiff, v. AARON OTHMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Aug 5, 2021

Citations

No. 20-2371-DDC (D. Kan. Aug. 5, 2021)