From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummings v. Dovey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 28, 2007
No. CIV S 07-2425 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S 07-2425 FCD GGH P.

November 28, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Petitioner is presently incarcerated at Corcoran State Prison in Kings County. He is serving a sentence for a conviction rendered by the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

The general rule with regard to habeas applications is that both the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted and the District Court where petitioner is incarcerated have jurisdiction over the claims. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973). In the instant case, the petitioner's conviction occurred in an area covered by the District Court for the Central District of California. Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).


Summaries of

Cummings v. Dovey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 28, 2007
No. CIV S 07-2425 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Cummings v. Dovey

Case Details

Full title:MARIO CUMMINGS, Petitioner, v. JOHN DOVEY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 28, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S 07-2425 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2007)