From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stotler v. Dep't of Transp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 25, 2013
76 A.3d 624 (Conn. 2013)

Opinion

2013-07-25

Ellen STOTLER, Administratrix (Estate of Paul A. Stotler III) v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

Eric P. Smith, in support of the petition. Ronald D. Williams, Jr., Trumbull, in opposition.


Eric P. Smith, in support of the petition. Ronald D. Williams, Jr., Trumbull, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 142 Conn.App. 826, 70 A.3d 114, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff's action should have been dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the allegations in the plaintiff's complaint failed to state a cause of action under the highway defect statute, General Statutes § 13a–144?”

McDONALD and ESPINOSA, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Stotler v. Dep't of Transp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 25, 2013
76 A.3d 624 (Conn. 2013)
Case details for

Stotler v. Dep't of Transp.

Case Details

Full title:Ellen STOTLER, Administratrix (Estate of Paul A. Stotler III) v…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jul 25, 2013

Citations

76 A.3d 624 (Conn. 2013)
309 Conn. 921

Citing Cases

Stotler v. Dep't of Transp.

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the…

Stotler v. Dep't of Transp.

Stotler v. Dept. of Transportation, 142 Conn.App. 826, 843, 70 A.3d 114 (2013). We granted the plaintiff's…