From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummings v. Ark. Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2024
4:24-CV-00998-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-CV-00998-JM

12-02-2024

JOSHUA DONTAE CUMMINGS ADC # 172826 PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Cummins Unit, East Building Max, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore and the objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommended Disposition is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

2. The Court recommends that dismissal of this action be considered a “STRIKE,” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Cummings v. Ark. Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2024
4:24-CV-00998-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Cummings v. Ark. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA DONTAE CUMMINGS ADC # 172826 PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 2, 2024

Citations

4:24-CV-00998-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)