From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Culpepper v. Efird

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 29, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV390-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV390-HEH

06-29-2017

ROY EVANS CULPEPPER, JR, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM A. EFIRD, III, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on June 7, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. On June 15, 2017, the United States Postal Service returned the June 7, 2017 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER" and "NOT AT THIS ADDRESS." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date:June 29, 2017
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Culpepper v. Efird

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 29, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV390-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Culpepper v. Efird

Case Details

Full title:ROY EVANS CULPEPPER, JR, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM A. EFIRD, III, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV390-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 29, 2017)