From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Culp v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
May 9, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1680-P (W.D. La. May. 9, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1680-P

05-09-2017

MARVELL ANTONIO CULP, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

In a response to the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff states that he filed the captioned suit in error, tinder the mistaken belief that his previous case, 1:16-cv-1267, had been dismissed in full as opposed to only the Bivens claim being dismissed. (Doc. 13).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the captioned matter is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to the prosecution of Culp's FTCA claim in the currently pending suit, 1:16-cv-1267.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because of Plaintiff's misunderstanding, the filing fee in the captioned matter only SHALL NOT be collected. Plaintiff is still responsible for filing fees incurred in other cases.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, this 9 day of May, 2017.

/s/ _________

DONALD E. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Culp v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
May 9, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1680-P (W.D. La. May. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Culp v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARVELL ANTONIO CULP, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1680-P (W.D. La. May. 9, 2017)