From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Culliver v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 2, 2020
292 So. 3d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-2302

04-02-2020

Domonic Marquis CULLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and John Stevenson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and John Stevenson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See McMillian v. State , 214 So. 3d 1274, 1286 (Fla. 2017) ("When placed in ‘their proper context,’ an interrogating detective’s statements to a suspect could be understood by a ‘rational jury’ to be ‘techniques’ used by law enforcement officers to secure confessions.") (quoting McWatters v. State , 36 So. 3d 613, 638 (Fla. 2010) ).

Kelsey and Nordby, JJ., and Salvador, Tatiana R., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Culliver v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 2, 2020
292 So. 3d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Culliver v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOMONIC MARQUIS CULLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 2, 2020

Citations

292 So. 3d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)