Opinion
No. 1D19-2302
04-02-2020
Domonic Marquis CULLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and John Stevenson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and John Stevenson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Per Curiam.
AFFIRMED . See McMillian v. State , 214 So. 3d 1274, 1286 (Fla. 2017) ("When placed in ‘their proper context,’ an interrogating detective’s statements to a suspect could be understood by a ‘rational jury’ to be ‘techniques’ used by law enforcement officers to secure confessions.") (quoting McWatters v. State , 36 So. 3d 613, 638 (Fla. 2010) ).
Kelsey and Nordby, JJ., and Salvador, Tatiana R., Associate Judge, concur.