From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Culling v. Hansen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
2:22-cv-01349-WBS-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01349-WBS-EFB (HC)

02-08-2023

HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER HANSEN, Respondent.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a county jail inmate proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

ORDER

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 16, 2022 are adopted in full;
2. This action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;
3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and
4. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Culling v. Hansen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
2:22-cv-01349-WBS-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Culling v. Hansen

Case Details

Full title:HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER HANSEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 8, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01349-WBS-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)