From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Culling v. Hansen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2022
2:22-CV-01349-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-01349-WBS-EFB

11-30-2022

HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, JR., Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER HANSEN, Respondent.

ERIN J. RADEKIN, Attorney for Petitioner HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, Jr.


ERIN J. RADEKIN, Attorney for Petitioner HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, Jr.

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying motion and declaration of counsel, and good cause appearing, the time to file petitioner's objections to findings and recommendations is enlarged by 30 days, making it due on December 30, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Culling v. Hansen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2022
2:22-CV-01349-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Culling v. Hansen

Case Details

Full title:HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, JR., Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER HANSEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-01349-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)