From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Culin v. Silversmith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 4, 2013
No. 12-cv-0478 RB/SMV (D.N.M. Apr. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-cv-0478 RB/SMV

04-04-2013

LUCAS CULIN, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN SILVERSMITH, DONNA GOODRICH, ADRIAN DIAZ, RIO ARRIBA CNTY. BD. OF COMM'RS, MCKINLEY CNTY. BD. OF COMM'RS, and JOHN AND JANE DOES, Defendants.


ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

THIS MATTER is before the Court pursuant to a Telephonic Status Conference held on April 4, 2013. To facilitate a final disposition of this case, a mandatory Settlement Conference will be conducted in accordance with Rule 16(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The conference will be held on June 7, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in the Cimarron Courtroom, fifth floor, Pete V. Domenici United States Courthouse at 333 Lomas Boulevard Northwest in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

The parties or a designated representative, other than counsel of record, with full authority to resolve the case, must attend in person. Counsel who will try the case must also attend in person. Those attending the settlement conference must treat as confidential the information discussed, positions taken, and offers made by other participants in preparation for and during the conference. See generally Hand v. Walnut Valley Sailing Club, No. 11-3228, 2012 WL 1111137 (10th Cir. Apr. 2, 2012) (unpublished) (affirming dismissal of case as sanction for violating confidentiality of settlement conference).

This does not prohibit disclosures stipulated to by the parties, necessary in proceedings to determine the existence of a binding settlement agreement, or as otherwise required by law.

No later than May 24, 2013, Plaintiff shall serve on Defendants a letter setting forth at least the following information: (a) a brief summary of the evidence and legal principles that Plaintiff asserts will allow him to establish liability; (b) a brief explanation of why damages or other relief would be warranted; (c) an itemization of the principles supporting those damages; and (d) a settlement demand. No later than May 28, 2013, Defendants shall serve on Plaintiff a letter that sets forth at least the following information: (a) any points in Plaintiff's letter with which the defense agrees; (b) any points in Plaintiff's letter with which the defense disagrees, with references to supporting evidence and legal principles; and (c) a counteroffer. If a release is contemplated, defense counsel shall include a proposed form of release with the letter. Each of these letters typically should be five pages or fewer, and counsel must ensure that each party reads the opposing party's letter before the Settlement Conference. If the case does not settle, Plaintiff shall provide copies of these letters to the Court no later than 12:00 p.m. on May 31, 2013.

If the parties have engaged in settlement negotiations, Plaintiff's demand should be lower than Plaintiff's most recent demand, and Defendants' counteroffer should be higher than Defendants' most recent counteroffer.

No later than 12:00 p.m. on May 31, 2013, each party must provide the Court, in confidence, a concise position statement (typically no more than ten pages) containing an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of its case. Position statements must be submitted to the Court by e-mail at VidmarChambers@nmcourt.fed.us.

Each e-mail message and its attachments cannot exceed 5 MB. Data exceeding 5 MB should be submitted in individual e-mail messages, each less than 5 MB.
--------

Furthermore, if any party has in its possession any video or audio recording of the incident upon which this action is based, that party must submit a copy of the recording to the Court no later than 12:00 p.m. on May 31, 2013.

The Settlement Conference will not be vacated or rescheduled except upon motion and for good cause shown. Any motion to vacate or reschedule the Settlement Conference shall provide the Court with sufficient notice to ensure that other matters may be scheduled in the time allotted for the Settlement Conference.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Plaintiff's letter and settlement demand due to ¦May 24, 2013 ¦ ¦Defendants: ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------¦ ¦Defendants' letter and counteroffer due to Plaintiff:¦May 28, 2013 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------¦ ¦Plaintiff provides copies of settlement letters to ¦May 31, 2013, 12:00 ¦ ¦the Court by: ¦p.m. ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------¦ ¦Parties' confidential position statements due to the ¦May 31, 2013, 12:00 ¦ ¦Court: ¦p.m. ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------+-----------------------¦ ¦Settlement Conference: ¦June 7, 2013, at 10:00 ¦ ¦ ¦a.m. ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

STEPHAN M. VIDMAR

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Culin v. Silversmith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 4, 2013
No. 12-cv-0478 RB/SMV (D.N.M. Apr. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Culin v. Silversmith

Case Details

Full title:LUCAS CULIN, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN SILVERSMITH, DONNA GOODRICH, ADRIAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

No. 12-cv-0478 RB/SMV (D.N.M. Apr. 4, 2013)