Culberson v. State

Full title: Karlos CULBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Aug 27, 2019

591 S.W.3d 10 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 106873

08-27-2019

Karlos CULBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT, Alexandria Shah, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT, Alexandria Shah, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karlos Culberson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).