From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuglietto v. Ferone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 2000

February 28, 2000

In an action, inter alia, to set aside conveyances of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered March 19, 1999, which denied their motion for leave to replead pursuant to CPLR 3211(e).

Sidney A. Weisberg, Great Neck, N.Y. (Daniel Weisberg of counsel), for appellants.

Ferone Ferone, Eastchester, N.Y. (Leonard A. Mancini of counsel), for respondents.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for leave to replead pursuant to CPLR 3211(e). The plaintiffs' motion was not made in connection with a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint, as the complaint had already been dismissed. Moreover, the plaintiffs did not submit the requisite proof for aCPLR 3211(e) motion (see, 527 Smith St. Brooklyn Corp. v. Bayside Fuel Oil Depot Corp., 262 A.D.2d 278 [2d Dept., June 1, 1999]), and, in any event, the proposed new complaint did not allege fraud pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law § 276 in sufficient detail (see, CPLR 3016 [b]; Menaker v. Alstaedter, 134 A.D.2d 412 ).


Summaries of

Cuglietto v. Ferone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Cuglietto v. Ferone

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA CUGLIETTO, et al., appellants, v. GARY M. FERONE, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 752

Citing Cases

Swartz v. Swartz

The amended complaint failed to make specific factual allegations with respect to many of the corporate…

Sutton Associates v. Lexis-Nexis

Sutton's submissions fail to establish its entitlement to an order permitting it to replead its claims as…