From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuffey v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1998
255 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 17, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.).


The motion court properly dismissed plaintiffs' complaint in light of plaintiffs' failure to raise a triable issue as to whether defendant had prior written notice, pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-201 (c) (2), of the sidewalk defect alleged to have caused the infant plaintiff's harm ( see, Curci v. City of New York, 209 A.D.2d 574, 574-575). The alleged curb and/or sewer cap defect does not appear on the relevant map prepared by the Big Apple Pothole and Sidewalk Corporation relied upon by plaintiffs to establish that defendant was afforded the requisite notice. We note in addition that while prior written notice is not a condition of municipal liability where a plaintiff is able to demonstrate that the City caused or created the alleged defect, here plaintiff has presented no evidence to sustain such a theory ( compare, Cruz v. City of New York, 218 A.D.2d 546).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Cuffey v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 17, 1998
255 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Cuffey v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SHAMIQUA M. CUFFEY, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, DEBORAH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 14

Citing Cases

Tucker v. N.Y

In affirming the dismissal of the action, the Court of Appeals stated that "[t]he City had no prior written…

Sorrento v. Duff

Where, as here, a prior written notice statute is in effect, a municipality's, actual notice does not relieve…