Opinion
6:22-cv-777-RBD-RMN
10-04-2023
NEIL CUFF, Plaintiff, v. FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY & BOARD OF TRUSTEES; TAYANNA MARR; JESSICA WARTHEN; MARLON HONEYWELL; JOCELYN SPATES; MARVIN SCOTT; JASON MOBLEY; ARCHIE LENNARD; SOHEYLA MAHDAVIN; PATTY GHAVINI; and JOVIN MYLES, Defendants.
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In this closed discrimination case, the pro se Plaintiff moved to appeal in forma pauperis. (Doc. 131 (“First Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway entered a Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should deny the First Motion. (Doc. 132 (“First R&R”).) Then Plaintiff again moved to appeal in forma pauperis. (Doc. 133 (“Second Motion”).) Judge Norway entered another Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should deny the Second Motion. (Doc. 134 (“Second R&R”).) Plaintiff filed an incoherent objection (Doc. 138 (“Objection”)), which fails to show any deficiency in Judge Norway's analyses, so the First and Second R&Rs are due to be adopted. (Docs. 132, 134.)
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Objection (Doc. 138) is OVERRULED.
2. The First and Second R&Rs (Docs. 132, 134) are ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in their entirety.
3. The First and Second Motions (Docs. 131, 133) are DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.