From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuevas v. BMW of Manhattan, Inc.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
May 10, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50623 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

570762/16

05-10-2017

Julio Cuevas, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BMW of Manhattan, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.


PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Gonzalez, JJ.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Anthony Cannataro, J.), entered July 31, 2015, after inquest, dismissing the complaint.

Per Curiam.

Judgment (Anthony Cannataro, J.), entered July 31, 2015, reversed, without costs, complaint reinstated, and matter remanded for a new inquest.

The sparse record now before us does not permit meaningful appellate review of the issues presented, including whether the court properly dismissed plaintiff's breach of contract action after inquest. In addition, the trial court's ruling did not set forth the ultimate or essential facts relied upon in reaching its decision. Under these circumstances, we remand the matter for a new inquest and issuance of a decision in conformity with the specificity requirements of CPLR 4213(b) (see Nunez v Bardwil, 145 AD3d 909, 910 [2016], lv dismissed 29 NY3d 931 [2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT. I concur I concur I concur Decision Date: May 10, 2017


Summaries of

Cuevas v. BMW of Manhattan, Inc.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
May 10, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50623 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

Cuevas v. BMW of Manhattan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Julio Cuevas, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BMW of Manhattan, Inc.…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: May 10, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50623 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
57 N.Y.S.3d 674