From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuesta v. Cuesta

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 2, 2016
186 So. 3d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D15–794.

03-02-2016

Angel E. CUESTA, Appellant, v. Carolyn A. CUESTA, Appellee.

Benjamin T. Hodas and Michelle North Berg of Law Office of Benjamin T. Hodas, LLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Darryl P. Figueroa, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.


Benjamin T. Hodas and Michelle North Berg of Law Office of Benjamin T. Hodas, LLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Darryl P. Figueroa, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion: (1) that portion of the circuit court's final order denying the former husband's supplemental petition for termination or, in the alternative, reduction in spousal support; and (2) the circuit court's order denying the former husband's motion for rehearing. We dismiss without prejudice the former husband's appeal of that portion of the final order granting the former wife's motion for attorney's fees and costs, but reserving jurisdiction to determine those amounts. See Revier v. Revier, 45 So.3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“We dismiss [the] aspect of the final judgment as it relates to the award of attorney's fees since the trial court determined only entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future day.”). Affirmed in part, dismissed without prejudice in part.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cuesta v. Cuesta

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 2, 2016
186 So. 3d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Cuesta v. Cuesta

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL E. CUESTA, Appellant, v. CAROLYN A. CUESTA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

186 So. 3d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Voorhees v. Voorhees

As a result, we are required to dismiss this portion of the appeal without prejudice. See Cuesta v. Cuesta,…