Cuddy v. Starbucks Corp.

Full title: JANINE C. CUDDY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 3, 2023

3:22-cv-00459-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Apr. 3, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00459-ART-CLB

04-03-2023

JANINE C. CUDDY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, d.b.a. Starbucks Coffee, Defendant.

WILLIAM J. GEDDES, ESQ. THE GEDDES LAW FIRM, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff, JANINE C. CUDDY Z. KATHRYN BRANSON, ESQ. MICHAEL D. DISSINGER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant, STARBUCKS CORPORATION

ANNE R. TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WILLIAM J. GEDDES, ESQ. THE GEDDES LAW FIRM, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff, JANINE C. CUDDY

Z. KATHRYN BRANSON, ESQ. MICHAEL D. DISSINGER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant, STARBUCKS CORPORATION

ORDER APPROVING

STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

ANNE R. TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, JANINE C. CUDDY (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, STARBUCKS CORPORATION (“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to the dismissal of this action in its entirety, with prejudice, with each Party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. As the matter has been resolved, the Parties desire to dismiss this case in its entirety, with prejudice.

The Parties agree that neither Party shall be deemed to be a prevailing party in this action and that neither Party will file for an award of costs or attorneys' fees pursuant to any rule, statute or law, whether local, state or federal, in any forum that would be available.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.