From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CUDA v. CUDA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 2005
19 A.D.3d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

CA 04-02188.

June 10, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered December 16, 2003. The order, among other things, adjudged that defendant's retirement benefits, to the extent they accrued during the marriage, are marital property.

SKANADORE REISDORPH LAW OFFICES, WHITESBORO (DEBORAH S. SKANADORE REISDORPH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ANN W. MANION, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Before: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051).


Summaries of

CUDA v. CUDA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 2005
19 A.D.3d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

CUDA v. CUDA

Case Details

Full title:CAROL A. CUDA, Respondent, v. GARY D. CUDA, Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 923