From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cubberly v. Yager

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 31, 1886
42 N.J. Eq. 289 (Ch. Div. 1886)

Opinion

10-31-1886

CUBBERLY v. YAGER.

A. S. Appleget, for complainant. Wm. Clark, for defendant.


A. S. Appleget, for complainant. Wm. Clark, for defendant.

BIRD, V. C. The complainant sold to defendant a tract of land for $4,000. In the deed was this clause: "And the said Ira Yager doth assume two certain bonds and mortgages, held on said property, one held by Jacob Fisher for $500, and one held by John F. Applegate for $2,300, which sums the said Yager is to pay, and is deducted from the said purchase money." The deed contains covenants of warranty. The deed was executed and delivered in 1869. The defendant immediately took possession of the land, but neglects to pay the balance due the mortgagees. Yager became the principal debtor, and Cubberly the surety, in the judgment of law. In such case equity will compel the principal to discharge the obligation. Irick v. Black, 17 N. J. Eq. 189; Marsh v. Pike, 1 Sandf. Ch. 210, 10 Paige, 595. I think the complainant is entitled to the aid of the court in compelling the defendant to discharge this obligation. He must pay the whole balance due. I cannot determine the amount due, as the holders of the mortgages are not before the court, and they have a right to be heard. But it is the business of the defendant to know the amount due, and to pay it. There ought to be a decree in accordance with these views, with costs.


Summaries of

Cubberly v. Yager

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 31, 1886
42 N.J. Eq. 289 (Ch. Div. 1886)
Case details for

Cubberly v. Yager

Case Details

Full title:CUBBERLY v. YAGER.

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 31, 1886

Citations

42 N.J. Eq. 289 (Ch. Div. 1886)
42 N.J. Eq. 289

Citing Cases

Pierson v. Pierson

But later adjudications under the separate maintenance statute have disclosed certain essential differences…

Miles v. Miles

Weigand v. Weigand, 41 N.J. Eq. 202, 3 A. 699, affd. 42 N.J. Eq. 699, 11 A. 113. As far as the evidence…