Opinion
December, 1916.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs; time to answer extended.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY v. BECK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Summaries of
CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY v. BECK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for
CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY v. BECK
Case Details
Full title:CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY v. EMAN L. BECK
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1916
Citations
175 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)