Opinion
December, 1916.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and answer on payment of costs. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY v. BECK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Summaries of
CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY v. BECK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for
CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY v. BECK
Case Details
Full title:CUATOTOLAPAM SUGAR COMPANY, Respondent, v. EMAN L. BECK, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1916
Citations
175 App. Div. 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)